The New Rules for Reality Television

So there I was, watching Real Housewives  of Beverly Hills and thinking that these women on this show, ostensibly created to highlight the lives of wealthy women, were the real deal. They were actually wealthy (well, except for Kim Richards, but they needed her crazy eyes) and living these charmed, ridiculous lives. I was also thinking that Camille Grammar lives in an alternate reality, but that’s besides the point. ANYWAY, I thought about how busted and broke housewives like the basically-bankrupt Teresa Giudice, Lynne Curtin, and NeNe Leaks are really just pretending to live the lifestyles of the rich and famous while dodging calls from their creditors. I get that reality television is far from real, but hot damn, at least have the common courtesy to cast your show to actually match your premise, you know?

Sure, I’m crabby right now. I sound like Andy Rooney. But it’s lazy production. Documentary filmmakers might come up with awesome ideas for films. They have to find real subjects to film. You might have a great premise for a reality show, but if you want to make a great show, you’ll find subjects who are actually what you purport them to be. It’s just one of the liberties these shows have been taking with “reality”.  Reality television has started running rampant over its viewers, and I’m not taking it any more. This isn’t ‘Nam, reality producers. There are rules. And, in homage to Bill Maher, I think it’s time for some New Rules for reality television.

  • If you don’t have a Wikipedia entry about you, you cannot be cast on a “celebrity” show. Case in point: someone please explain to me why Keyshia Cole’s mom (ahem, biological mom who didn’t even raise her) is fit to be cast on Celebrity Rehab? Call Intervention for that noise. One of Tiger Wood’s mistresses is “addicted to love”? Robert Palmer is dead, lady. That’s one hell of a stretch, VH1, and you know it.
  • If you quit a reality show, you quit a reality show. This week’s episode of Survivor had not one, but two quitters. TWO. In one episode. And both NaOnka and Kelly (the quitters) both still get to go on and serve on the jury that decides the eventual winner of $1,000,ooo. Call me crazy, but if you decide for whatever reason that you aren’t going to stick it out, you’re done. No jury. No reunion show. No press tour. You’ve reneged on your (albeit shitty and close to indentured servitude) contract. And if spades teaches us anything, it’s that reneging is a damn near felony. Don’t get me wrong. If your dad is on his deathbed with cancer, go on and be with her. If you fall into a fire and need to be helicoptered out of Borneo or whatever, you should probably do that. There are such things as extenuating circumstances. But if you can’t take the heat and are just a quitter, you quit everything. I don’t want to see your quitting-ass face, you quitting quitter.
  • All celebrity reality shows must have one “busted hair metal veteran”. I ask you, who would disagree with this rule brought forth by Laurie? Vince Neil is on a fucking ice skating show. Why would you watch this shit unless you had the chance to see some Motley Crüe moose knuckle? Rock of Love was mostly cool because viewers kept hoping that Bret Michael’s strategically-placed bandanna-with-horsehair would slip and show his undoubtedly-bald-and-unmetal dome (well, that and chicks doing chach shots off each other). Bret Michaels The New Rules for Reality TelevisionOne of the pioneering shows of the genre was The Osbournes, which was only successful because people just could not believe that the Prince of Fucking Darkness was now a doddering, domesticated semi-invalid. The harder they rock, the further they fall. Ratings gold. Trust me, producers. You’ll make back what you spend in furnishing eyeliner, and your viewers deserve it.
  • Please, declare a moratorium on new giant family shows. We get it! You’re just like us! Except you do things in bulk! And drive busses! It’s chaos! The Duggars are out of control 525x378 The New Rules for Reality TelevisionSnoozefest. I respect your right to reproduce in mass quantities. I don’t respect your choice to turn your litter into a cash cow, and I question your ability to care for said brood without network money. I have no desire to see any more families who are using more than their fair share of the earth’s resources. Truth be told, it’s not that interesting any more. Did we learn nothing from Octomom?
  • And while you’re at it, cut the dating shows. Shows like The Bachelor, The Bachelorette, or Rock of Love rarely create actual love. Trista and Ryan are the exception, not the norm. Jake the bachelor is a douchebag 525x299 The New Rules for Reality TelevisionThese shows are just vehicles for aspiring famewhores to get their fifteen minutes and maybe an STD. While you’re at it, would it kill you to vet the relationship status of your contestants who are supposed to be looking for love? What’s with this whole “Surprise! I have a girlfriend!” business? Don’t even get me started on the feminist implications of women “competing” for a virtual stranger’s affections. Cut the pretense before the entire country gets herpes via association. It’s starting to smell in here.
  • Viewers need, nay, demand, reasonably-sized episodes. I can handle a two-hour Dancing With The Stars, if that’s what it takes to get through twelve contestant dances and a few professional ensemble numbers. But this whole The Biggest Loser being two hours long EVERY WEEK thing? Yeah, I quit watching. Cut out the Extra sugarfree gum and Jennie-O turkey shilling and repeated scenes before and after the frequent commercial breaks, and there’s no reason this show can’t fit into 42 minutes. You’re greedy, NBC and your show is incredibly worse for it.

What’s your new rule for reality television?


Subscribe to MamaPop


(Advertisement)

  • Suziannie

    I agree with your last point. I love America’s Got Talent, but the only way to make the last 4 or 5 episodes bearable to watch was to DVR them and fast forward through all the crap. 1 hour of TV filled with retelling of stories we knew, showing footage we’ve seen, numerous commerical breaks and performances of exsisting celbrities turned into about 15 min of show.

    Same with Hell’s Kitchen, if they’d stop with the 15 min recap of what happened previously at the start of the show, and the pointless point of view comments from the contestents and add more yelling about risotto and scallops being undercooked it’d be a heck of a lot more entertaining.

    • http://southcityconfidential.com K Best Oliver

      Exactly. I have low standards for what I do and don’t watch, but that kind of filler makes me quit watching shows, and I have DVR.

      • http://www.amalah.com amalah

        I quit watching Biggest Loser because of the two hours of maddening filler aspect too! Seriously: if Amazing Race can keep all that footage of a dozen or so clueless tourists traveling around the entire damn world down to under an hour, so can a show that mostly consists of 1) crying, 2) stepping on a giant scale, and 3) more crying.

        An addendum to the filler rules: Stop coming back from commercial breaks with a re-airing of a full minute (or more) of the exact same footage that YOU JUST SHOWED US BEFORE THE COMMERCIAL BREAK.

  • JellyBean

    Ditto what you said, but add no stars who have experience with professional dance choreography (pop stars, certain actors & ice skaters) should be allowed on DWTS. I watch to see embarassing awkwardness, not grace.

    Also, Millionaire’s Club should be those that have multiple millions IN the bank, not just made a million.

    Real Housewives should OWN their homes. Clue #1 to impending bankruptcy – real wealthy people don’t rent.

    Also, I don’t think Kyle has real money either. More like Orange County money and not Beverly Hills money.

  • http://1219sibmtt.blogspot.com/ a.eye

    Don’t forget the annoyance of all that is the MTV Real World / Road Rules competitive challenges. I didn’t even know they still did Road Rules, but every time I look on the cable guide, there is a new challenge with a lot of the old characters who should be moving on from their connections with the show. I think the last one I bothered to watch might have had Norman from the original season on it. WTF?!

  • Suzy Q

    I would take exception to banning all of the Bachelor-type shows, but ONLY because of Miss Banshee’s awesome recaps. Without her recaps, they can all go blow.

  • http://issascrazyworld.com Issa

    I love Amazing Race and Top Chef. I can stand Idol, if I can fast forward through all commentary. Most of the others though could blow up and I’d never even notice. I remember the first Real World. What made it great, was it was something new. It’s not new anymore. It’s tiring.

  • Candace

    Can we start a petition to get NBC to cut down The Biggest Loser? I quit watching too. For a show about losing weight it was awfully bloated.

  • JB

    I wouldn’t mind TBL being 2 hours if it wasn’t so much recapping and filler. That show is like crack for me and I just can’t not watch it, even when I loathe all the remaining cast members, but I really really hate the filler and repetitiveness. And I could do without the idiots patting themselves on the back and being deluded (I’m looking at Brendan and Elizabeth, this season, for that one).

  • http://rancidraves.blogspot.com Kelli Oliver George

    Love.

    I remember as a little girl, loving Little House on the Prairie. I didn’t understand television and didn’t realize that it wasn’t real (I was only 5 and had not yet read the books. Yeah, my mind was blown eventually. BLOWN) Anyway, at that age, I thought TV was real and that camera crews followed Laura and her family around filming them. I was SO jealous because I wanted a crew to come and follow MY family around. Before you mock me, let me remind you that I was FIVE. Heh.

    God, how ahead of the times I was. Too funny.