Worst Book-to-Film Adaptations


There are some movie adaptations so bad, you want to hop into a time machine and go back to the invention of film and show that guy what hell his invention will bring onto the earth. Here are a few:

Bonfire of the Vanities

Bonfire of the Vanities Worst Book to Film Adaptations

Many people have said this book was unfilmable to begin with, in part because it’s so cynical and its main characters are so “unlikable.” Well, sure, but the solution isn’t making the main character of Bonfire of the Vanities likable, since it takes away a good portion of the book’s point about how class and racial disparity can allow even greedy jackholes nobody likes to get away with manslaughter. This movie is pretty universally hated, and the only reason I hesitated to include it in this list is because I hate the book about as much.

How the Grinch Stole Christmas/The Cat in the Hat

Grinch jim carrey 525x336 Worst Book to Film Adaptations

Before you shriek in outrage, I’m not talking about the animated  specials that are time-honored classics, so go pop a Xanax and relax. You know the live action movies? With Jim Carrey as the Grinch and Mike Meyers as the Cat in the Hat? They of the uncanny valley, unfunny, childhood-pillaging land of failure and tears? No wonder Taylor Momsen (Cindy Loo Who) grew up to be such a freak.

Brief Interviews with Hideous Men

brief interviews hideous men 525x778 Worst Book to Film Adaptations

It is possible to make a good movie from a series of short stories. Robert Altman did it with Short Cuts, which is loosely adapted from short stories by Raymond Carver. Brief Interviews with Hideous Men tries to string together several “interviews” from David Foster Wallace’s book of the same name, with a frame story that is basically: “smart girl gets her heart broken and decides to devote her entire doctoral work to figuring out why men are such assholes.” This sucks on two levels: for one, it makes the main character out to be some kind of obsessive freak who can’t keep her personal life separated from her academic life. But, more importantly, the best parts of Brief Interviews aren’t actually the “brief interviews,” but rather two unadaptable stories: “Forever Overhead” and “The Depressed Person”. You can’t adapt DFW to screen. Nice try, John Krasinski, but please don’t do it again.

The Scarlet Letter

the scarlet letter 525x683 Worst Book to Film Adaptations

Demi Moore and Gary Oldman starring in a steamy, sexy movie based on the most unsexy book in the history of literature! This movie is the literary adaptation version of those soft-core movies that parody popular Hollywood films and have titles like The Bare Witch Project or Star Whores.

The Human Stain

the human stain 525x295 Worst Book to Film Adaptations

Phillip Roth’s book is about professor Nathan Zuckerman, whose teaching career is ruined by a charge of racism. His wife dies, he takes up with a not-exactly-erudite worn-out janitor who has an abusive husband. Anyway, it turns out that  his entire life, Zuckerman has been living a lie, posing as a white, Jewish man when he is in fact half black. So who would you cast in the role of a biracial man posing as a Jewish professor? Who said Anthony Hopkins? Yeah, that’s right, NOBODY because it’s a terrible casting choice. And who would you cast as his careworn janitorial ladyfriend? Raise your hand if you said Nicole Kidman. Anyone? Yeah, bad casting in a movie that’s character driven is kind of a deal breaker, folks.

Lolita

Lolita poster 525x688 Worst Book to Film Adaptations

Lolita is not a comedy. I will say it again: LOLITA IS NOT A COMEDY. Stanley Kubrick should have left this one alone. At the time the movie came out, its poster read, “How did they ever make  a movie of ‘Lolita?’” The critics’ response? “They didn’t.”

Well, okay, Adrian Lyne did, but his adaptation, while more faithful, was not any better.

What book adaptations make you cringe and wail in agony?

About Snarky Amber

Snarky Amber pursued a degree in interdisciplinary studies in order to obtain a well-rounded perspective, which she now uses to make fun of people who make more money in a week than she stands to make in a lifetime.



From Our Partners

  • CH

    Gotta add “Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason” to this list. It’s one of my favorite novels–light, silly, fun, and a cute take on Jane Austen’s “Persuasion”–but instead they stripped it down to the three main characters, sucked any pleasure out of the book, and made a crappy sequel to a cute rom-com. I was so excited when I heard this was being made, but aside from the 90 minute nap that was “Because I Said So,” I’ve never been more disappointed in a movie. I go back to reread parts of the book from time to time just to remind myself that it’s a good story.

    Glad to see “The Grinch” on here. I had to sit through it when I was babysitting last month, and it was awful. Let’s add in Mike Myers’ “Cat in the Hat,” too, for similar offenses.

    • Karen

      Not to mention they messed like hell with the story line. In the movie, the woman Bridget thinks is her rival for Darcy ends up being infatuated with BRIDGET. Uh. I must have missed that subtext in the actual novel. Blargh.

      • CH

        Cause it wasn’t in the novel! The novel had this fabulous take on “Persuasion” where the woman is conniving to keep Darcy from Bridget. It’s hilarious and dramatic, with lots of cute moments, and the ending is lovely. None of that is in the movie.

  • Becky

    Texasville by Larry McMurtry. One of my all-time favorite laugh-out-loud books, it is actually the sequel to “The Last Picture Show”. Movie is HORRID. I was ticked off for months after seeing this movie.

  • norm

    Pretty much all of them, so I’ll cut right to the chase and suggest a counter-example. I really loved the movie adaptation of “Enigma.” I really liked the novel and I think Robert Harris is fantastic. However, in this case I think the movie really improved upon the book, adding character development and tension and some minor plot alterations that made for much better film. Of course the screenplay by Tom Stoppard did not hurt one bit. And to further develop the mystery and suspense, Kate Winslet keeps her clothes on.

  • http://slackermama.com Marilyn

    I definitely agree with the majority of this list but… I have a special spot for Jim Carrey’s “Grinch”. I know it’s awful but somehow it’s the awfulness that I adore. FWIW, I cannot STAND Mike Myers’ “Cat” so there’s that. I guess mere logic cannot explain why I like the new “Grinch”. ;)

    I am also still smarting at what they did to “Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince” but was mollified by “Part 1″ of “Deathly Hallows” which I thought was done much much better.

  • http://issascrazyworld.com Issa

    Most of the time I don’t care how they change a book, when making the movie. Books are books. Movies are movies. The worst though? My sister’s Keeper. You can’t just decide to completely change an ending to a book like that, because it sounds more believable. Just wrong. That one was just plain wrong.

    • http://nannersp.com Nanette

      Yup, this was my first thought, too. Loooved the book but loooathed the movie.

      • Rebekah

        OMG – I completely agree – I love Picoult’s books, but after that nightmare I don’t ever want to see another of her novels adapted because that was just disgusting. I mean the book has it’s own perfect version of a happy/sad ending. Not to mention they completely cut out the G.A.L. character and invented the boyfriend… WHY??!!!

        • Vickie

          I generally like the first 90% of Jodi Picoult’s books–and I hate her twists at the end, especially when it’s an emotional wringer, like MSK. I actually liked how the ending of MSK changed in the movie–it felt so much less emotionally manipulative.

  • Jana

    Whatever the movie was called that was supposed to be an adaption of “A Prayer for Owen Meany” HORRIBLE! Jim Carrey was in this as well.

    • Jana

      Oh, it was called “Simon Birch”

      • Vickie

        I love John Irving novels and always hate John Irving movies, with the exception of Cider House Rules, though the movie still ended up leaving so much out. A Prayer For Owen Meany is impossible to do in 2 hours! I liked the adaptation of A Widow For One Year (The Door in the Floor with Kim Basinger and Jeff Bridges) but it was just of the first section of the book, when Ruthie was 4 years old. Then again, AWFOY’s sections can stand alone as individual stories.

        In general, John Irving adaptations are impossible–the richness of his plots and characters can’t be condensed!! Look at the Garp adaptation–that movie had me horrified from beginning to end, whereas the book had me laughing non-stop. I read recently that A Son of the Circus is in development–I am betting that’s going to be another disappointment.

  • Clarabella

    I would like to add Demolition Man, which was supposedly a *loose* interpretation of Brave New World, but it’s disgusting.

    • Bec

      Really? I’ve not read “Brave New World” but Demolition Man… ah, that’s a go-to movie for me when I’m stroppy or sick or have a huge basket of ironing to plow through. You didn’t feel the love?

  • Bitchilla

    “The Cider House Rules” – such a good book and they totally changed it and f-ed it up for the movie. And there was no reason to make the changes they did.

  • http://www.agirlandaboy.com/journal agirlandaboy

    Eek! “Lolita” is my favorite favorite favorite book of all time, and I think both film versions were good in their own right. There’s a lot of humor in the book (which is why it’s so brilliant considering the extremely unfunny subject matter), and although the film versions are certainly *different* from the book–and each does very different things with the original text–I still feel like they did as good a job as they could considering the eras in which they were produced. I mean, the first version was Kubrick, for crying out loud.

    • http://www.awkwardlysocial.com Tamara

      I totally agree! I thought the book had a fair amount of comedy in it. And Kubrick’s version was an amazing film in its own right.

  • http://mightyhunterin21stcentury.blogspot.com/ Mighty Hunter

    Stanley Kubrick deserves a pass because he followed Lolita with Barry Lindon, 2001: A Space Odyssey, and (a movie you previously raved about) The Shining. They can’t all be winners.

    Totally agree with Bonfire.

    Why no hate for graphic novels? Sin City, for example, is a great graphic novel series, WHY DID THEY DO THAT TO THE MOVIE? Some great moments, to be sure but as a whole: no thanks.

  • http://www.danielletodd.com Danielle

    Confessions of a Shopoholic. It was a mediocre but cute book turned into an unwatchable movie.

    Also, The Time Traveler’s Wife. So much was lost in the film adaptation.

    • http://yezelbelle.wordpress.com/ Yezelbelle

      I totally agree with Time Traveler’s Wife. The entire ending changed…and the characters were so SHALLOW on film. Horrible on film.

  • Peggasus

    The books are AMAZING, but the screen version of ‘Dune,’ starring a young Kyle McLachlan, are truly horrible. They might as well have had cartoon thought bubbles as a major character.

    • http://mightyhunterin21stcentury.blogspot.com/ Mighty Hunter

      SciFi’s (SyFy’s?) mini-series version was both better in general and more faithful to the first book. If you haven’t seen it yet, I highly recommend that you correct this forthwith.

      • Peggasus

        I do have that on disc, I agree it is much, much better. There is that campy vibe to the first that sucks me in every time, though.

      • pbblythe

        I must concur. Also – Children of Dune from SciFi (SyFy) was quite good. Of course the James McAvoy casting helps as well.

  • JellyBean

    I loved the book Under the Tuscan Sun but was so disappointed in the movie b/c it changed everything from the book and cast Diane Lane in the role of what was supposed to be a 50+ yr old woman. Why did they have to make the author younger & single? The scenery was the only saving grace in the movie.

  • http://www.agirlandaboy.com Simon

    Prince of Tides. Oh, that book had me reading in bed until 5:00 AM three nights in a row. The film held NONE of the charm, humor, drama, suspense, or joy of the book.

    (Yes, I read friggin’ Prince of Tides. Whatcha gonna do about it, huh punk?)

    • http://magical27.blogspot.com Kirsty

      Totally agree – I’ve read that book several times, always obsessively and compulsively… Yet the film? Gaaaahhhhh… The characters LOOKED just about right (Streisand as the shrink? Yeah, could have worked) but oh, I don’t know, all the depth and emotion and trauma and everything was just sucked out of it…
      I lost my copy of the book and the only replacement copy I could find has the film’s main picture on the front and even that just kills me…

  • Ed

    Agreed about “Dune”. But I think “Exit to Eden” wins it. It was like turning “The Story of O” into an iCarly episode.

    • http://katharama.wordpress.com Katharama

      Oh, I had so tried to put Exit to Eden out of my mind. An absolute travesty.

    • http://missbanshee.typepad.com Miss Banshee

      Oh, Ed. “The Story of O” into an “iCarly” episode? That’s so hilariously sick and wrong. I love it.

  • http://www.oscarelli.blogspot.com Jenni

    The Shipping News and Feast of Love. Two of my favorite books, ruined.

  • http://unicornpara.de Tanie

    Howl’s Moving Castle, the Studio Ghibli movie DECIMATED the entire story- the plot, the characterizations, everything. TOTAL ANIME FAIL.

  • Suzy Q

    Anything written by Stephen King and turned into film has sucked.

    Glad you included those hideous, hideous remakes of the Suess cartoons. Just ugh.

    • http://www.agirlandaboy.com/journal agirlandaboy

      Surely you’ve forgotten “Stand By Me,” which is WONDERFUL.

      • http://snarkyamber.tumblr.com Snarky Amber

        And Shawshank Redemption. Apt Pupil…not so much.

        • http://katharama.wordpress.com Katharama

          Well, Apt Pupil wasn’t good on the page either, so that’s not a fair comparison. But, yeah, a majority of King adaptations have been terrible (especially miniseries such as The Tommyknockers). Although, I actually enjoy the movie Carrie far more than the book.

          • http://missbanshee.typepad.com Miss Banshee

            I love the movie of “Carrie” but enjoyed the book far more. I dunno, maybe it was because we see more into Carrie’s mind in the book, which doesn’t translate as well to film? I really like both of them, but I’ve got to stand by the book as the superior product.

        • http://raisingzoeyjane.com Zoeyjane

          And Cujo. Cujo was cool. Also? Pet Cemetery. It had its cheese, but by god, did they capture the chillingness of Gage.

          • Vickie

            The Stand was a brilliant book, but even using the mini-series to tell the story visually didn’t work. Pet Sematary as a book scared me so much as a teenager…the movie, meh. I thought Misery was a fair, entertaining adaptation. I saw Ron Howard on The Daily Show talking about working on the DArk Tower series–I think it could be done, since I have mixed feelings about the series (especially the last book!!!), but I’m hoping it works.

  • norm

    Oh gawds. No one has yet mentioned “Dune.” I have only myself to blame. I still have not forgiven David Lynch. How can a movie that was so perfectly cast (except for the Baron) suck so hard? Oh, right. The Baron. Shai-hulud preserve me, that movie blew mutant sand goats.

    • norm

      Oh somebody *had* mentioned Dune. Whew. TY.

  • http://magical27.blogspot.com Kirsty

    What about Danny Boyle’s hideous attempt at making “The Beach”? The book had so many levels and was much, much more than a love triangle on a Thai island… Leonardo di Caprio was totally wrong (the main character’s Britishness is part of the whole thing) and leaving out the Vietnam part, and the Swedes and the sharks and the loner guy (don’t remember the character’s name, but he’s not in the film at all) and oh, what a crap film that was! I was sooooo disappointed because I loved the book!

    • Rebekah

      OHHH! I had wiped that from my memory – that book is one of my fav’s too and the movie was horrifically changed to have more of a love story and too much of a “happy ending”…. Good one!

  • Rebekah

    I have to agree with Danielle re: Confessions of a Shopaholic and The Time Traveler’s Wife…

    My personal 3 favorite books have all been completely RUINED as films, IMHO. Amazing novels, crappy films:

    1. East of Eden (The 1955 one with James Dean – I don’t care how many people rave about this, it is TERRIBLE and starts 3/4 of the way into the original story. They cut out a huge portion of the people, stories, and all of the character development that makes the ending so powerful in the novel).

    2. The Lovely Bones – completely changed the center of the story from that of a family redefining their relationships after the loss of their daughter/sibling to the “In Between/Heaven” world that Susie inhabits, but that was certainly not the focus of her story. Never mind that they condensed the timeline by about 10-15 years (I understand that part).

    3. The Girl’s Guide to Hunting and Fishing – (retitled to Suburban Girl for the film) I refuse to see the movie version of this because they chopped and edited it so much the summary of the film doesn’t even reflect the original story. Not to mention they cast Sarah Michelle Gellar across from Alec Baldwin as the romantic leads. Ick.

  • Ed

    One more: “Endless Love”. Zeffirelli BUTCHERED it.

  • http://rebeccacrawford.typepad.com Becca

    Interview With the Vampire (although the movie did make me read the book for the first time) and Queen of the Damned (although although Stuart Townshend made a MUCH better Lestat than Tom Cruise). The movies just absolutely butchered the books. I wish they’d reboot them, but sadly, that only happens for comics.

  • englishsunset

    I do like Bridget Jones…period, book or otherwise. Lolita…James Mason was perfect and so was the book…go figure.

  • michelle

    I completely agree with the killing of Anne Rice’s books on screen. I have to add one of my favorite books, The Club Dumas by Arturo Perez-Reverte. It was adapted into The Ninth Gate with Johnny Depp and I barely recognized the story.

  • michelle

    I have to add one of my favorite books, The Club Dumas by Arturo Perez-Reverte. It was adapted into The Ninth Gate with Johnny Depp and I barely recognized the story.

  • http://yezelbelle.wordpress.com/ Yezelbelle

    I think we are forgetting a very big popular one right now….ah, the TWILIGHT series.

    *insert multitudes of young girl screams*

    I read the books before the movies came out. The books were so much better…and I’m not sure if it’s the screenplays or what…but I blame the lead actors. Ridiculous at how romantic the movies could have been.

  • http://txtingmrdarcy.wordpress.com Txtingmrdarcy

    I want to admit my utter nerd-dom and add “Eragon” to the list. Christopher Paolini’s book was vast, exciting and imaginative. The movie is childish and wooden. Such a disappointment!

    • AmandaG

      When I saw the title of the post Eragon was the very first thing that came to my mind. Totally stupid movie. Could’ve been awesome.

    • Michelle

      I second Eragon!

  • diamondcait

    The Natural, by Bernard Malamud. I liked the movie on its own, but THEY CHANGED THE ENDING OF THE BOOK! Forrest Gump, because the book was a mean-spirited brilliant satire, and not the feel-good story of a lovable half-wit. I totally agree with Dune, all of the Anne Rice books, andA Prayer for Owen Meaney.

  • http://swanfeet.wordpress.com/ ladyphlogiston

    I have a special spot of hate reserved for the movie version of I, Robot. The book should have been hard to adapt – it’s a series of short stories strung together as an interview about the integration of robots into society, so if they didn’t want to do the whole string they could have done one or two of the short story plots. But no. They kept a few character names, they made up a plot, and the take-away message was the exact *opposite* of the original.

    And to add insult to injury, it is now substantially harder to buy a copy of the book without Will Smith on it.

  • http://raisingzoeyjane.com Zoeyjane

    I am Legend. So wrong.

  • Vickie

    My husband would say Voyage of the Dawn Treader. He loves the Narnia books deeply and was so disappointed in the 3rd movie, because it’s based on his favorite of the books.

  • ana arias

    i think my sister’s keeper deserves to be here. a nearly perfect book completely destroyed by the film. the end was like WTF? did that just happen?