According To Kirk Cameron, Kirk Cameron Is Smarter Than Stephen Hawking


With The Rapture a few scant days away, people are understandably concerned about whether or not Heaven exists, and if so, whether or not they’ll gain admittance. Talk of Saturday, May 21, as being the day that the faithful will be called home to Jesus, leaving the rest of us sinners and non-Christians behind to face an eternity of Satanic torment, makes me nervous. I’m an agnostic, and so in this time of great spiritual upheaval, I turned to two of the world’s great thinkers, physicist Stephen Hawking (one of the greatest scientific minds of our or any time, whose theories on quantum gravity as it applies to black holes revolutionized cosmology and the way we think about time and space) and Kirk Cameron (star of TV’s Growing Pains).

Earlier this week, Hawking was asked if he believed in Heaven. The human brain is like a computer, he stated in an interview in The Guardian newspaper. When it breaks down, that’s it. Done. It’s just meat, only good for scientific study. (And, I would argue, zombie snacks.) “There is no heaven or afterlife for broken-down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark”, Hawking stated. And indeed, hundreds of years of research, based on scientific principles, does not show any proof of an afterlife.

kirk cameron 580x573 According To Kirk Cameron, Kirk Cameron Is Smarter Than Stephen Hawking

Kirk Cameron disagrees. On his Facebook page, the star of the movie…hang on while I Google this, as I’m unfamiliar with his post-Growing Pains work…ah, here we go, Fireproof, points out some of the fatal flaws in Hawking’s argument. Drawing on what he learned playing a fireman in the movie Fireproof, Cameron states that Hawking has an “unfair disadvantage” (not sure what that is) and that “to say anything negative about Stephen Hawking is like bullying a blind man.” (Guess he means Hawking’s numerous degrees in mathematic and physics?) Cameron then goes on to talk about the belief that life came from nothing is scientifically impossible. (Unlike, say, a wise old man who lives in a cloud, occasionally popping down to Earth to turn women into pillars of salt, or just flooding the whole damn planet out of spite.) Then he takes a hard look at John Lennon. “John Lennon wasn’t sure. He said to pretend there’s no Heaven. That’s easy if you try. Then he said he hoped that someday we would join him.” He then goes on to say that “John Lennon also said that he was the Egg Man. And then he said he was the Walrus. That’s crazy talk. You can’t be both. Indeed, in Psalms 9:14, it says ‘Neither the large sea-beast nor the man of shell and yolk canst thou be; pick one, and dealeth.’ It’s in the Bible, yo.”

Left behind According To Kirk Cameron, Kirk Cameron Is Smarter Than Stephen Hawking

For Kirk Cameron, life imitates, uh, "art".

So the End Of Days approaches, and I’m still leaning towards Science. I doubt a few of us are going to be ascending to Heaven this weekend while the vast majority of us face an eternity of Satanic torment. And I’m pretty sure that once you’re dead, you’re dead. On the other hand, it doesn’t hurt to be prepared. (And yes, that’s a text-only version of the U.S. Center for Disease Control’s page about what to do in the event of a zombie holocaust. The actual page isn’t loading, I’m guessing due to traffic volume. End Times, y’all.)

 

Source.

 

About Jason Avant

Jason presides over a vast blogging empire that includes DadCentric and his personal site, Pet Cobra. When he's not blogging, he can be found surfing or skateboarding or just gazing out his window, muttering incoherently about someone or something named Rosebud.



From Our Partners

  • Suzy Q

    I have a colonoscopy scheduled for next Tuesday, so I’m down with the world ending on Saturday.

  • babs

    I’m cool with Hawking saying that he doesn’t believe in God, but he also insulted those who do calling their belief a “Fairy story”, which is pretty bold since there is no hard proof that no God exists. After all, causality is a law in physics, and as such there must be a “source” cause of all things. Regardless of what you call the ultimate source, there is more indication of intelligent design than whatever Hawking believes.

    That said, I have plans for Sunday, so I’m not exactly on Team Cameron either.

  • http://www.emkayultra.com Mz

    Hey Babs-
    It’s not an insult if it’s true.
    Just saying….
    Mz

    • Mona

      I’m pretty sure it’s insulting either way. I’m not a big fan of insulting a person’s personal faith and beliefs, any more than I am of people who use religion as a club against others who do not share their views. Smug and judgemental isn’t pretty from either viewpoint- and I’m talking to you Kirk Cameron. Live and let live, yo.

    • babs

      Yeah, it’s insulting. And I am by no means a fan of Kirk’s form of evangelism either, but the point is if we are to be tolerant of one another in the name of peaceful existence, then calling another person’s core belief a “fairy story” is rude and unnecessary. I have friends who are atheists and they are very good at expressing their beliefs without attacking mine.

      • http://www.emkayultra.com Mz

        Well, not really.

        If you are convinced that water is not wet, but all scientific evidence kind of says that it does, in fact, meet the definition of “wet” and I let you know that what you believe is wrong, I’m not being insulting, I’m relaying the facts.

        Stephen Hawking was just relaying the facts. And he didn’t treat anyone like a special snowflake while doing it. He was clear and concise.

        • babs

          Maybe your point would stick if he hadn’t said, “that is a fairy story FOR PEOPLE AFRAID OF THE DARK” at that point he’s making a personal judgment on why people have faith. The fact remains people have faith for all kinds of reasons, many that are not fear-based at all. I get that Hawking can have an opinion about those of us who have faith, and I don’t think I “deserve” his respect by any measure. However, if I came out said that atheism is simply a way for people who don’t like rules to make themselves feel better about being selfish navel-gazers, that would be an insult to atheists.

  • Kim

    “Indeed, in Psalms 9:14, it says ‘Neither the large sea-beast nor the man of shell and yolk canst thou be; pick one, and dealeth.’ It’s in the Bible, yo.’”

    That is the funniest thing I’ve read all week!

    • http://www.irmafloresta.blogspot.com Irma

      I laughed so loud I scared my dogs.

  • http://www.missmooseart.com Lis

    Kirk didn’t pay that much attention in science class, did he? The theory of the universe is not that we all manifested out of nothing. All of the “stuff” that was propelled out in the Big Bang was there -before- the Big Bang. In fact it is entirely possible that there was a whole different, wholly existing, universe that contained all kinds of functioning things (and potentially, “people”, though I imagine in a different makeup than what we are). One of the main principles of physics is that you can’t make energy (which, in turn, equals matter)– it is a finite resource in the entire universe, and all we can do is mash it up in different ways over and over again.

    Okay, I realise Kirk probably didn’t even take science classes. But I still had to vent.

  • http://jiveturkeyjives.com/ Jive Turkey

    This is my favorite quote of Kirk’s: “Why should anyone believe Mr. Hawking’s writings if he cannot provide evidence for his unscientific belief that out of nothing, everything came?”

    Awfully bold of him, cracking on someone else for not being able to provide EVIDENCE FOR HIS UNSCIENTIFIC BELIEFS (*cough*talkingsnakespillarsofsaltvirginbirths*cough*).

  • http://www.whithonea.com Whit

    Kirk Cameron is the poor man’s Stephen Baldwin.