How thin is thin enough in Hollywood? I ask because this is the cover of this week’s “Life & Style”:
Questions: I haz dem.
First of all, HOW in god’s name is Katie Holmes not already considered WORRYINGLY skinny? How? Here’s a photo of her from a few months ago (from back in early May, when, one supposes, she considered herself to be NOT skinny and in need of dropping a couple of pounds):
Voice of John McEnroe: YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS.
A confused: Now I haz dat, too.
According to Life&Style, Katie Holmes is acting out by way of weight loss, because Lord Xenu/Tom Cruise has so wholly subjugated her that food is the only means by which she has to gain any meager measure of control in her life. Her thinking (if you can call it that), a L&S source claims, is that “Tom may have taken over every aspect of her life, but only she has control over her body.” And I guess “control” means, what? Diet Coke and laxatives? That’s not control, Katie, that’s DEHYDRATION. THERE’S A VERY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE.
I’m not even going to pretend to understand the epic, area-wide body dysmorphic disorder afflicting Hollywood. There is no sense to be made of that. Instead, I’ll just let these photos of Katie released today speak for themselves.
Do you see ANY noticeable difference between this and the photo above? Am I high?
Listen, Katie, it’s okay. You got this. And you look great in those jeans. SO HAVE A SAMMICH ALREADY, FOR CRISSAKES. GAH.
About Tracey Gaughran-Perez
