My Boyhood Hero John Carter Is A Flop, And This Makes Me Sad


First, let’s get this out of the way: I’m a straight guy, and even I think Taylor Kitsch is a handsome devil.

 

taylor kitsch john carter 600x450 My Boyhood Hero John Carter Is A Flop, And This Makes Me Sad

That’s Kitsch dressed up as my boyhood hero in full Barsoomian regalia, from his new movie John Carter. Now, I’ve probably confused you. “Boyhood hero? Are you MamaPop’s resident 10-year-old ubermensch writer, Jason?” And more than a few of you saw the trailers to the Disney blockbuster and thought, “say, guy gets transported to a mysterious planet, befriends a bunch of tall aliens, becomes their greatest warrior, and joins them to fight encroaching humans…where have I seen that before?” Before you say Avatar and curse John Carter for being yet another unoriginal Hollywood money machine, allow me to educate you.

When I was about ten, I was with my parents perusing the sci-fi section of Waldenbooks (pours one out) when I came across a book with a rather striking cover – a Frank Frazetta painting of a burly guy swinging a longsword at a giant white ape with a very hot, very scantily clad woman at his feet. The book was called A Princess of Mars, and while the title was a bit offputting, that cover was irresistible. These were the desert years, between Star Wars and Empire, and I needed something to fill in the geeky gap. From page one, I was hooked: an ex-Confederate soldier, chased into a cave by Apache warriors, finds himself transported to the planet Mars – called Barsoom by its many inhabitants – and basically spends the next few hundred pages swordfighting, racing through the Martian air on flying battleships, rescuing the titular princess from several nasty villains/creatures, and swordfighting. The book is basically one long setpiece, and much of it was familiar – even at ten, I recognized a ripoff when I saw one, and the guy that wrote it, Edgar Rice Burroughs, was gonna be in a heap of trouble when George Lucas read his books. Then I saw the copyright date: 1917.

FrankFrazetta John Carter 600x390 My Boyhood Hero John Carter Is A Flop, And This Makes Me Sad

OG JC.

Burroughs wrote 11 John Carter books in all, and they’re all pretty much the same: dated, ridiculous, and an incredible amount of fun to read. I tore through them all over the course of a year, and while I was hoping against hope to eventually see a John Carter movie, the realist in 10-year-old me knew that it would be a tough sell. The books were epic in scale – huge battles, giant monsters, stuff that probably couldn’t be done with the special effects tools of the time. Plus, you know, Mars is a freezing cold, lifeless planet with a thin, unbreathable atmosphere. Still, when I heard that Disney was finally making a movie out of the series, I started  talking it up to my son. My kid’s not quite old enough to read the books, but that didn’t stop me from getting him psyched up to see the movie. I was out of town when he did, and I’m happy to report that he loved it.

Sadly, most people weren’t as geeked over the flick as he was. In fact, it flopped. Big time. As in “cost one hundred sixty five million to make, grossed $30 million on its opening weekend”. I can’t help but be bummed out about this. Disney and director Andrew Stanton were (of course) planning a trilogy of John Carter movies, and unless $350 million worth of ticket sales are generated by folks who read this post and immediately run to the theaters, that will never happen. If you were one of the few (we’ll get to that in a second) that saw the movie when it opened, you probably observed that the movie is pretty much just like the following: Avatar, The Lord of The Rings, Star Wars, Dances With Wolves, Neil Gaiman’s Stardust, Conan the Barbarian, Thundarr the Barbarian, He-Man and The Masters of The Universe…hell, even the Macguffin of Total Recall (the Atmosphere Generating Pyramid Thingy) was lifted from Burroughs. So the “ripoff” buzz didn’t help , even though Burroughs thought of all of this stuff first.

To me, though, the biggest strike the movie had against it was the title. The original title of the flick was John Carter of Mars, which sounds way cooler. But for some reason, it was shortened to John Carter, possibly to fool people into thinking it was gonna be like Jerry Maguire or Larry Crowne. The title tells you nothing. When the kid and I first saw a poster for the flick, he had no idea what it was about. For all he knew, it could have been about this dude:

noah wyle john carter My Boyhood Hero John Carter Is A Flop, And This Makes Me Sad

 

So that’s likely the last we’ll see of John Carter on the big screen. Sigh. On the flip side, I’m sure my son will want to read the books when he’s a bit older. (Bonus: in the books, the female characters don’t wear any clothes.) Plus, I figured I’ve saved myself a few hundred dollars by not having to purchase John Carter action figures, ray guns, and swords for the kid.

source, source, source

About Jason Avant

Jason presides over a vast blogging empire that includes DadCentric and his personal site, Pet Cobra. When he's not blogging, he can be found surfing or skateboarding or just gazing out his window, muttering incoherently about someone or something named Rosebud.



From Our Partners

  • http://twitter.com/awestintx awestintx

    My kids loved it, so I guess they will have to “settle” for reading the books.

  • livi

    The original title of the movie was to be the same as the book. It was changed to “John Carter of Mars” because movie execs didn’t think boys would want to see it. It was then shorted to “John Carter” because they didn’t think girls would watch a movie about Mars. Perhaps if movie execs didn’t try to pigeon-hole their audience they would get more people to watch. If the title had been left “A Princess of Mars” more people who read the books would have recognized and/or more girls would have gone because there is a dearth of movies featuring girls. I can’t figure out why Hollywood thinks girls’ money is icky.

    http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/andrew-stanton-explains-john-carter-name-change-says-girls-wont-see-a-movie-with-mars-in-the-title#

    • Norm Nelson

      I know, right?!? That is what is bugging me the most about this. Why mess with the title like that? ARRRGH. I bet it would have done better at the box office if they’d just left it alone. And if everybody still read good (ok, bad) classic science fiction. 

  • Laura

    My husband and I went to see it last weekend and both thoroughly enjoyed it – like you, I am disappointed by the negative reviews by critics (even though it seems like most real people who saw it enjoyed it) and by the low box office numbers.  I desperately want it to succeed, as I NEED TO KNOW what happens next!  Plus, my husband saw Andrew Stanton speaking in San Francisco a few weeks ago, and said he seemed so passionate about the story and this movie.

    I think some of the problems with it stem from the lack of easy descriptors.  We came home and told my parents (the babysitters) about it, and had a hard time figuring out the right words to say.  It is just such an EPIC story, and hard to explain.  That, and because it takes place on Mars, all the names are a little weird, making it easy for people to get distracted by the “oddness” of it all.

    Thanks for the post!

  • Tasterspoon

    I’m sorry to hear this.  There was a very encouraging article in Wired last month and I was looking forward to its being great.  I wonder whether I as a female would enjoy the books.  I think a parade of naked women might annoy me.

    • http://swanfeet.wordpress.com/ ladyphlogiston

      I tore through the first three (on project gutenberg) in two days after seeing the movie.  They’re silly, but a lot of fun.  No one wears clothes, but Burroughs was writing before it was appropriate to talk about boobies, so aside from a few discreet mentions of her “lovely figure” it’s really a non-issue.  The racism is actually the worst bit (again, not surprising for that era) but if you choose to acknowledge it and get on with life you’ll probably enjoy them.  Don’t expect much character development, though – it’s pretty much all action.

      My family really enjoyed the movie.  Silly, sure, but lots of fun and a really good balance of romance/action/pretty costumes/stuff blowing up.

  • Tyskkvinna

    I didn’t even know this was a movie, it sounds like they failed pretty hard at advertising it..

  • tomtrad1

    I’ve never heard of the books or the character at all so when I glimpsed posters advertising the film, I assumed (because I didn’t actually LOOK at them) that it was going to be some serious “political thriller” or something. And as I have two impossibly scaredy-cat daughters there’s little chance I’d have taken them to this anyway. But the title really does seem to be a mistake (it seems even more odd here in France where – I’m guessing – absolutely NO ONE has heard of the books).

  • http://crabbyappleseed.blogspot.com/ crabby appleseed

    Yes, well, every single time I see a preview for this movie, I think of Noah Wylie, so thank you for acknowledging that.

  • MollyGMartin

    There is still a 4-story picture of Taylor Kitsch outside my office window so, um, that’s something.